Details
 

October 19, 2016
11:00AM - 12:00PM

CFPB and FTC Enforcement is Real: Don't Let Your Dealership Be An Easy Target!

Stay Informed and Take Action Today!

OADA Webinar

REGISTER HERE!Brown Bag Lunch Webinar Series

Both the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have continued to be aggressive with enforcement actions and their investigations of industry practices. Dealers who have been paying attention continue to worry about what might be next, and with good reason.  The CFPB now asserts that, while a three-year statute of limitations limits the time the Agency has to bring claims in federal court, no statute of limitations applies to administrative actions.  The FTC has also expanded its authority by approving 20-year consent decrees and, in some cases, including new and vague compliance standards with no guidance on how dealers can comply with them.

Over the course of the past year, the CFPB has:

  • proposed a rule prohibiting mandatory arbitration clauses;
  • conducted examinations of compliance management systems and automobile financing;
  • found that “auto lenders” deceptively advertised the benefits of GAP coverage products;
  • announced a consent order against a dealership requiring it to pay $700,000 in restitution and a civil penalty of $100,000 for “abusive financing schemes, hiding auto finance charges and misleading consumers”; and
  • continued its investigation related to the cost, value and presentation of ancillary products.

In addition to the actions of the CFPB, the FTC has:

  • approved a final consent order with two Ohio dealerships that imposes uncertain disclosure obligations in connection with advertising offers of credit;
  • increased penalties for violations of the FTC Act from $16,000 to $40,000 per day, per violation;
  • imposed an $85,000 civil penalty against a dealership group for allegedly violating an FTC consent order banning it from engaging in deceptive advertising practices;
  • announced a $72,000 settlement to resolve allegations that a company violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to have adequate polices for addressing consumer disputes about information provided to credit reporting agencies; and
  • settled lawsuits with a manufacturer and two dealership groups for allegedly failing to adequately disclose that advertised vehicles may have outstanding safety recalls.

Not by coincidence, dealership compliance with federal and state laws is coming under increased scrutiny by state regulators and the lenders who offer financing to dealerships’ customers as well. Dealers across the state of Ohio have received letters from the Office of the Ohio Attorney General alleging violations of both federal and state advertising laws, including claims similar to those asserted by the FTC.  Lenders have also been reviewing dealership paperwork much more carefully and have amended their dealer agreements to include broader warranties regarding compliance, more liability shifting provisions, and longer recourse terms.

Staying on top of legal and regulatory developments, implementing appropriate policies and procedures, and training dealership personnel are the keys to success.  Don’t become an easy target because you failed to make a modest investment in compliance today!  Sign up for OADA’s webinar on October 19, 2016.  Deanna Stockamp of Stockamp & Brown LLC will discuss these recent developments and what they mean for dealers, as well as some of the OADA hotline’s most frequently asked compliance questions.

Connection fee for the webinar is $25 per connection, with a $50 connection fee for non-members. Register today!

Printer-Friendly Version


Add to Calendar aCLuDhaqizCaPxAftmqF167204 10/19/2016 11:00 AM 10/19/2016 12:00 PM false CFPB and FTC Enforcement is Real: Don't Let Your Dealership Be An Easy Target! REGISTER HERE! Both the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have continued to be aggressive with enforcement actions and their investigations of industry practices. Dealers who have been paying attention continue to worry about what might be next, and with good reason.  The CFPB now asserts that, while a three-year statute of limitations limits the time the Agency has to bring claims in federal court, no statute of limitations applies to administrative actions.  The FTC has also expanded its authority by approving 20-year consent decrees and, in some cases, including new and vague compliance standards with no guidance on how dealers can comply with them. Over the course of the past year, the CFPB has: proposed a rule prohibiting mandatory arbitration clauses; conducted examinations of compliance management systems and automobile financing; found that “auto lenders” deceptively advertised the benefits of GAP coverage products; announced a consent order against a dealership requiring it to pay $700,000 in restitution and a civil penalty of $100,000 for “abusive financing schemes, hiding auto finance charges and misleading consumers”; and continued its investigation related to the cost, value and presentation of ancillary products. In addition to the actions of the CFPB, the FTC has: approved a final consent order with two Ohio dealerships that imposes uncertain disclosure obligations in connection with advertising offers of credit; increased penalties for violations of the FTC Act from $16,000 to $40,000 per day, per violation; imposed an $85,000 civil penalty against a dealership group for allegedly violating an FTC consent order banning it from engaging in deceptive advertising practices; announced a $72,000 settlement to resolve allegations that a company violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to have adequate polices for addressing consumer disputes about information provided to credit reporting agencies; and settled lawsuits with a manufacturer and two dealership groups for allegedly failing to adequately disclose that advertised vehicles may have outstanding safety recalls. Not by coincidence, dealership compliance with federal and state laws is coming under increased scrutiny by state regulators and the lenders who offer financing to dealerships’ customers as well. Dealers across the state of Ohio have received letters from the Office of the Ohio Attorney General alleging violations of both federal and state advertising laws, including claims similar to those asserted by the FTC.  Lenders have also been reviewing dealership paperwork much more carefully and have amended their dealer agreements to include broader warranties regarding compliance, more liability shifting provisions, and longer recourse terms. Staying on top of legal and regulatory developments, implementing appropriate policies and procedures, and training dealership personnel are the keys to success.  Don’t become an easy target because you failed to make a modest investment in compliance today!  Sign up for OADA’s webinar on October 19, 2016.  Deanna Stockamp of Stockamp & Brown LLC will discuss these recent developments and what they mean for dealers, as well as some of the OADA hotline’s most frequently asked compliance questions. Connection fee for the webinar is $25 per connection, with a $50 connection fee for non-members. Register today! OADA Webinar